InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 112693
Next 10
Followers 95
Posts 11597
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/27/2011

Re: MD-420 post# 96280

Tuesday, 07/10/2018 11:22:53 AM

Tuesday, July 10, 2018 11:22:53 AM

Post# of 112693

Maybe mcig should signs more time crafting each pr. Based on track record, there's a reason they don't, and why they have you. Rollies anyone? If mcig was legit, their PRs would be solid and contain verifiable data. They wouldn't need Rio communicate through you to spin the story.



All I do is correct misinformation and false accusations made by you and your cohorts. Your favorite technique is to search public records before they're available and updated and then accuse the company of not having verifiable information. Remember your accusations about California City not showing a license or land purchase for mCig? You guys said the whole thing was a scam, that Kern County wouldn't let them grow and mCig would never get a license. So much for your verification techniques. LMAO

BTW As I've said a number of times since they missed their targeted launch, Rollies are still in the plan. The initiative was delayed because the rolling machine would get gummed up after a certain amount of product was produced. They now believe that the bugs have been worked out and we should see something once mCig's California facilities are up and growing a reliable supply of product.

Les