InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 1673
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/08/2018

Re: Dutch1 post# 46864

Friday, 07/06/2018 4:45:34 PM

Friday, July 06, 2018 4:45:34 PM

Post# of 52849

A honest and respectfull question:

What has changed with GERS and KK in the past weeks/months that would make KK’s behaviour worst then it was in the past years to you, and GERS a worst investment?


If you keep proving that you don't listen to me, I'm going to stop responding to you.

1. This company has not filed ANY reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission since the third quarter of 2016. Not one 10-Q is available for the fourth quarter of 2016, any of the four quarters in 2017, or the first quarter of this year. That means that none of us can make an intelligent investment decision. Every day, week, and month that goes by without the literal benefit of seeing up-to-date financial statistics of this publicly-traded corporation makes the 2016 Q3 stats that much less valuable. This is a disadvantage that can be rectified by a court, and every week that goes by without this valuable information gives me more reason to ask a court to force Ugly Kevin to supply it to me and the other shareholders.

2. This company hasn't filed any 8-Ks with the SEC that would give the investors and potential investors some up-to-date information on who is in control of this company. Bitzio, which owned 80% of our stock as of the third quarter of 2016, could've been replaced over a year ago. There hasn't been any notification to the shareholders whatsoever. I call that GROSS NEGLIGENCE BY KEVIN KRISTLER, and I would love to hear the official opinion of the Appeals Court on this matter. If Warren Buffett was the new owner of 80% of this company, I would probably not want to sell my shares, but if Kevin's college roommate was the new owner, which is much more likely, given Kevin's bizarre behavior during the past two years (no SEC reports since 2016 Q3, remember?), I might want to sell at any price, even a market price instead of the fixed price on my limit orders.

3. As of the third quarter of 2016, the last quarter for which the investors have good information, this company had two primary classes of assets. One was their patents. Even though their validity is now the subject of litigation, the Greenshift Corporation still can still license those patents to other companies. Those licensing deals, and the revenue that they bring in, were the second of Greenshift's major assets IMHO as of the third quarter of 2016. I said those patents and the licensing deals were the second of the company's major assets.

4. Kevin has now transferred to another company all of Greenshift's patents, and as I said very recently, the price and terms weren't even disclosed to the shareholders. HOW can any of us verify that what Attis offered in exchange for the patents is comparable to the fair market value of the patents, judging by the amount of royalty income and other benefits that the licensing deals produced? Did Attis get our licenses as well as our patents? What the HELL is left of this company's assets anyway? An empty building with Kevin's ugly face framed in a picture on the wall?

Kevin is as transparent as Mississippi mud, but someday, a court will tell him who's the real boss. I hope I'm there when it happens. I also hope to visit him in a Federal prison someday.

"Harry"