InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,715.30
(
0.22%
)
US TECH 100
19,301.60
(
0.02%
)
Dow Jones
42,070.67
(
0.02%
)
Brent Oil
74.52
(
0.85%
)
Bitcoin
63,286.31
(
-0.53%
)
Post# of 1912
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Jh5142

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2
Posts 273
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2017

Jh5142

Member Level

Re: Phaedrus77 post# 263

Thursday, 07/05/2018 12:00:57 PM

Thursday, July 05, 2018 12:00:57 PM

Post# of 1912
The SEC reviewed UDF IV's last 10q filed 11/9/15. It covered the quarter end Sept 2015.

that 10Q detailed all Loan Participation Interests and all notes receivable from affiliated entities.

If there was anything improper with those loan participations or notes from affiliated, then the SEC would have identified that. If they were overstated, or not legit, then they would have been addressed.

Also, UDF IV filed that 10Q with the SEC representing assets worth $684 million.

If there was anything inappropriate with those then the SEC would have identified those problems.

Therefore, I think it's possible to assume those financial statements could be reliable. If not, why would the SEC not have identified problems and why would they have settled?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up