InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 64
Posts 5557
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/17/2005

Re: iwfal post# 1331

Sunday, 10/22/2006 5:24:54 PM

Sunday, October 22, 2006 5:24:54 PM

Post# of 12660
iwfal - thnkx for answer .........


<<<"The results were pretty consistent - in 1000 trials of the same size a Cox Regression has a median improvement in p value of greater than 2x. Sometimes it was less than 2. But it never approached a 0x improvement.">>>

You probably covered these types too, but let me ask just in case - in DNDN's trials one unique thing is that there are almost no censored patients - also I wonder if your generated trials were there both "regular/classical" and "random/odd" shaped curves - but you thought of all that already ?



<<<"I suspect that they do push and generally the FDA pushes back.">>>

Just to remark that a doubling of the p value is like the difference between a 1-sided and 2-sided test - which of course the ICH guidance docs generally require, and the FDA generally gets.

Next time I see a Cox as a primary endpoint, I will be wondering what the justification is. But it does bode well for 9902b.

"....on the biotech battle-field, you need some élan...."

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.