I am not sure what Atty General would accomplish by that. Maybe first state to start a chain-reaction against changing cell phone and IOT pricing packages? The larger the electronics grid that controls our personal use info, would enable more tax revenue to state that gets new Clouding, AI siting facilities? Is that what would be behind this type of resistance to lowering package discounts, or would it be jockeying for some kind of state centric political 'look-what-I-am-doing' argument for coming Nov election effect donations?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.