InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 441
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/03/2018

Re: TTT777 post# 10169

Wednesday, 06/27/2018 2:57:08 PM

Wednesday, June 27, 2018 2:57:08 PM

Post# of 12427
I do not agree with everyone calling in & emailing. (with all due respect)
I seen PRPO get hit with that and the companies response was they have to get the SP up to attract BETTER investors. In fact because SOME literally burned up the email and phones they locked investors out of being able to ask questions on their Share Holder Conference call. At this point all OS is common shares with NO preferred shares sold which puts us front row on profits. Burn the company out on investor relations and they will be less apprehensive in screwing us common folks. They will also be less responsive on relations like PRPO as well. IMO

End of day just know that an SEC law prevents ANY company from responding and answering questions that involve "NON" public information.
A perfect example is CCAN, in which this warning was placed on their stock by the SEC
CCAN on the OTC Markets
"Warning! This company may not be making material information publicly available

Buying or selling this security on the basis of material nonpublic material information is prohibited under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 10b5-1 thereunder. Violators may be subject to civil and criminal penalties."

With this in mind, I think the best thing to do is extensive DD, research of the companies product and the demand of the product, and watch it like a hawk! Leave the pestering alone as by law, they can only provide information that has been filed and considered public knowledge anyway. IMAO