I don't know. What we do know, is Noreen was given a good PR, after many complaints a few months ago. But, those Pro's are being hacked to pieces by the attorney, who seems to want more involvement than any attorneys job entails.
Like LA and I have said, you don't let a PR person put their 2 cents in on legal matters. An attorneys job is one thing, and one thing only: "is this PR legal". That's it, nothing more.
There could also be other involvement, who knows. It's not an issue of legal competency, it's about allowing an employee or a contracted person to be involved way beyond the scope of their job description.
LA pointed asked the question why? Why would a lawyer push their involvement to such an extent to do more damage than food to the company stock value, that you have a legal obligation to protect?
As always, more questions than answers. I mean, I get IMUN, like all start up company works in the red until everything is in place and the company starts generating money. Maybe, the lawyer is working for peanuts or at such a low price, and Noreen doesn't think another lawyer with the same skill set would do the same at whatever the price she's paying, therefore, the lawyer has her kinda of hostage to impose her will on the PR's. Maybe Noreen is scared to lose her, therefore cant stand up and tell her to only do what she is paid to do.
I mean really, only conjecture, and I am hypothosizing, but hey it's one theory, because honestly, nothing about what is going on with the PR's makes any rational sense. Who knows, maybe the lawyer has control or insecurity issues. Many people do these days. She apparently is not happy or secure in her role as lawyer and needs to justify something to herself by this continuing detrimental involvement in PR's.
Again, we can only hypothesis out here in the darkness
