Ah yes...That complete and utter cluster f**k. Even that could have been salvaged by 4 desperate, in depth, after the fact, news releases....but again, nothing.
I like your thought on legal accountability though. It would definitely require much research, and finding some good precedent setting legal cases with similar situations to suggest/or pursue such an approach.
I personally, don't think things should ever have to come to that. And, as a shareholder, I would hope that it would never, ever come to that. It is something I would never want to see. However, finding some precedent setting cases, and even some not precedent setting cases that involve this very issue, would be an interesting read.
At a minimum, making our CEO (more importantly the board of directors) aware that such cases, that have been decided on before in favor of the companies investors, could be the thing that might, once and for all, make a change, in the way these PRs, news and transparency to the investors are handled in the future.
So far, there has been no voluntary willingness to address this issue so far. Like you have said, it has been the polar opposite.
I would think, a few favorable federal court cases(for the inverstors) faxed in showing this is a real world possibility, could be enough to finally address this issue. At a minimum, possibly push the board of directors to question the people they are contracting IMUN's work to, and make some changes. Hopefully it would also address the issue of allowing individuals who work/contracted by IMUN, from being involved in areas where they have no expertise, and is well outside their job duties and description.
I have said before, it is equally important the things not said, as the things that are. I agree with you, the deliberate, lack of information that has not been released has been devastating to IMUNs stock price and valuation.
Let me know if you come across anything. I think, it would be some interesting reading.
I hope these posts are read by all the powers that be in IMUN, and they understand that, yes, they are working on great things with Cytocom, and yes, this will have great impact on IMUNS stock value. but, you cannot willingly sacrifice IMUN's value in the meantime, and continue to be negligent to IMUN stock value and its shareholders along the way. Your shareholders are frustrated, some angry, and we are nearing a breaking point in the current value of our company.
The fix is easy, get some news out there. There are dozens of things that should have been put out to support our milestones, our agreements, our products, background on companies like Fidson and Cytocom. The people who are working with us, the experts who advise us, worldwide studies that have shown the positive affects of LDN, estimated future revenue based on legit numbers, the demand for non opiate drug use and prescription but the federal government....OMG THE LIST JUST KEEPS GOING ON AND ON. This is all factual stuff, not "fluff" and needs to be well written how these things all have a consolation to IMUN,CYTOCOM and the future of LDN.
LA, you are one smart dude, and it I very much enjoy reading your posts, and appreciate your knowledge. I have learned some good things.
