InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,537.02
(
0.51%
)
US TECH 100
19,634.80
(
0.80%
)
Dow Jones
39,308.00
(
-0.06%
)
Brent Oil
86.76
(
-0.18%
)
Bitcoin
58,203.00
(
-3.26%
)
Post# of 938
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

eaglesurvivor

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 35
Posts 5499
Boards Moderated 6
Alias Born 04/24/2006

eaglesurvivor

Re: janice shell post# 434

Friday, 10/20/2006 1:54:57 PM

Friday, October 20, 2006 1:54:57 PM

Post# of 938
janice shell: just last month, The Virginia Court of Appeals upheld the felony conviction of Jeremy Jaynes. The case law that is preliminary connected with that case bolsters The CAM-SPAM Act. The issues arising out of this particular UBE (unsolicited bulk emails) case help define crimes via UBE that fall under RICO guidelines. False email claims about stock prices are actually an interference of one's right to engage in interstate commerce. While UBEs, of the nature that we are discussing, do not meet all RICO requirements, they are commerce violations.

"When in doubt, empty the clip."

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up