Tuesday, June 19, 2018 8:30:15 AM
lol Yes, I guess that's the message - or at least that people should take a deep look into SIAF and judge themselves why the PPS is so low 
The amazing thing is why there is a need to sort to old disproven lies if SIAF is such an obvious scam...
So, to summarise some of the claims; TRW, which doesn't exist and which SIAF doesn't own 36.6% in although it is official in HK, and who doesn't produce anything is struggling with production because Tony (when misquoted) says so. Fascinating that these contradictory claims can be put forth at the same time... However, Tony can't be trusted when he refers to capex or AF1-3, so there needs to be heavy cherry-picking (and Tony isn't lying, which makes it rather challenging since one is supposed to ignore everything he says unless it is something bad), and the issues with the last phases with prawns at AF4 that he refers to is suddenly a truth for all stages of prawns, all aquatic creatures and all farms! (also we are to disregard that Tony refers to proven track-record for AF1-3 and his referral to the filings, but not because he is in on this "scam", but because of some strange reason that noone wants to share the reason behind) Furthermore there is no pictures of TRWs operations, even though there are pictures in busy markets with TRWs name. And so on and so on.
If I am to go by someone's suggestion, I would prefer to go with a seasoned investor who has been to the fascilities and done extensive DD than jump on the "everyone in the whole world is in on the scam"-train where the "evidence" is a low P/B and a falling PPS (which would make Seadrill an even worse scam than SIAF since Seadrill has fallen more PPS-wise than SIAF).
The amazing thing is why there is a need to sort to old disproven lies if SIAF is such an obvious scam... So, to summarise some of the claims; TRW, which doesn't exist and which SIAF doesn't own 36.6% in although it is official in HK, and who doesn't produce anything is struggling with production because Tony (when misquoted) says so. Fascinating that these contradictory claims can be put forth at the same time... However, Tony can't be trusted when he refers to capex or AF1-3, so there needs to be heavy cherry-picking (and Tony isn't lying, which makes it rather challenging since one is supposed to ignore everything he says unless it is something bad), and the issues with the last phases with prawns at AF4 that he refers to is suddenly a truth for all stages of prawns, all aquatic creatures and all farms! (also we are to disregard that Tony refers to proven track-record for AF1-3 and his referral to the filings, but not because he is in on this "scam", but because of some strange reason that noone wants to share the reason behind) Furthermore there is no pictures of TRWs operations, even though there are pictures in busy markets with TRWs name. And so on and so on.
If I am to go by someone's suggestion, I would prefer to go with a seasoned investor who has been to the fascilities and done extensive DD than jump on the "everyone in the whole world is in on the scam"-train where the "evidence" is a low P/B and a falling PPS (which would make Seadrill an even worse scam than SIAF since Seadrill has fallen more PPS-wise than SIAF).
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
