We agree in so many ways fcmboca.
My view is that the Trustee is naïve or incompetent for failing to see through or fairly consider Ed's Medizone and Shareholder destructive actions, committed on the eve of Medizone's widely distributed S-1 Registration and Share increase authorization approvals.
THE FACT IS THAT ON MAY 30, 2018, MEDIZONE WOULD HAVE ALREADY ACCOMPLISHED UNDER CEO ESPOSITO what Ex-CEO Ed is now trying to partially and indeterminately do in woeful and inadequate part.
TODAY, UNDER CEO ESPOSITO, MEDIZONE WOULD ALSO BE A FULL FLEDGED, FUNDED COMPANY moving towards completion of FDA preliminaries and from there on to the FDA De Novo classification approval process. It would have also been a company with SOME 2000+ shareholders behind it, eager to help it in any way they could.
Instead of the above positive outcome, Ex CEO Ed, destructively acted in silent consort with three other individuals to knowingly, willfully, and calculatingly conspire to kill Medizone and its shareholders FOR A WHOPPING ZERO DOLLARS in the bank, and who now COINCIDENTALLY willing to wait for an indeterminant value and settlement predicated on research that would have already been under way in Medizone.
I wonder if Ed's lawyer ethically explained to him the ramifications of his actions against Medizone and its shareholders, and that CEO Esposito could respond with Chapter 7.
