Many times, yes. I don't believe CEPSA bailed for no good reason after the dry hole. According to the JOA, CEPSA could have taken the entire block from ERHC because ERHC did not pay what was owed. They elected to leave instead after spending 10's of millions of dollars in the block. Why do you believe they did that after analyzing all the drilling data?
Also do you have any confirmation from ERHC or Kenya that ERHC retains an interest in the block after failing to meet its financial obligations? I haven't seen it and apparently nobody else has either.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.