Monday, June 11, 2018 2:57:05 PM
The SEC's main point is that GDSI could always register again. It's a ludicrous argument.
If GDSI's attorney makes five bucks an hour, he can easily rebut that argument. The SEC would essentially be telling the judge that GDSI should refile the financials that they may already have filed. That is an argument that makes no sense.
This is obviously predicated on GDSI getting their financials up to date. If they do, then the SEC's argument that no one gets hurt because GDSI can just re-register is absurd. Why, because the judge will ask this question. "Mr. SEC lawyer, if this company is so bad, why are you suggesting they should re-register at all?"
Argument makes no sense.
I still look at BSF. They knew all this and took the case. Means more to me than most opinions.
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM