InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 54
Posts 1239
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/09/2013

Re: gadfly6 post# 19518

Tuesday, 06/05/2018 10:56:08 AM

Tuesday, June 05, 2018 10:56:08 AM

Post# of 22600
Well, for what it is worth, the perceived value cannot increase without people buying on the ask. And I am not suggesting anyone here or anywhere to post known false or misleading information, but filling a message board with negative conjecture certainly isn't going to help improve the shareprice situation here that is for sure. JMO

The sad part is, by all indication, this actually had the potential with a period of confirmed non-dilution during a legitimate ICO. IMO the ICO failed with the failure of improved share price into a range befitting of serious investors taking it seriously. Unfortunately so, because it became a carnival ride for irresponsible and shortsighted traders. If they would have let it breath a little, the creditors could have potentially been compensated with ICO proceeds and the SS may not have taken the hit it did by frustrated creditors and this would potentially still be actively trading much higher than the recent highs. The latest filing shows the company to still be above water so in spite of this just becoming a ghost town of residual resentment, I am remaining cautiously optimistic over time necessary for company to implement it's business model. also JMO