Well, his employment agreement in the admission document for Merkur is a lie... Although I think most of the failures are well-meaning estimates, but some deliberate carrots as well (at least I haven't seen the effect of the F-1 they told us about in CC Q2).
However, it doesn't really matter whether it is deserved or not; status as of today is that he doesn't have credibility - even the most lojal (or is it "especially not the most lojal"?) shareholders are sceptic to whether there will be a dividend in Q4... And it is Solomon who has to fix the credibility-issue.
It will be paid, the question is whether there will be delays and how they will finance it (i.e more dilution?). They said something about FINRA-approval - is that a possible issue or is it just a possible excuse?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.