InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 126
Next 10
Followers 3
Posts 805
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/07/2002

Re: None

Monday, 09/08/2003 9:46:40 PM

Monday, September 08, 2003 9:46:40 PM

Post# of 126
From today's Deal article on Wcom -

A group of dissenting MCI bondholders has also objected to the plan, which gives MCI's subordinated noteholders nothing for their $750 million in claims. They state that the MCI debts should be repaid before holding company creditors receive anything, and argue that there is enough value to do so.

Seems the absolute priority rule is far from absolute.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.