Dan Byrnes leads all, by a huge margin, in giving misery to others in the SRSR deal. See below.
1. Stole money from his his sister to buy SRSR . His sister sued Dan in NY Syate and won a $254k judgement against Stealin Dan.
2. Illegally purchased SRSR for his pension plan without notifying the pension holders. Byrnes was taken to court and assessed a $310,000 fine to put back in the pillaged Fort Orange pension fund.
3. The ensuing sales from this orphaned Ft. Orange stock position led SRSR stock price to very low levels.
4. Byrnes tried an elaborate transfer of the Nemegosenda property to IGEX a cynical move that was designed to super dilute SRSR shareholders and to create a printing press for themselves. They failed miserably in this nefarious venture.
5. Instead of agreeing to an excellent Lithium deal $10MM development deal brought to Dan and Otto by Keevil they vetoed the deal because they were ignorant, greedy and bitter. With that deal the SRSR would be trading well over 5 cents today with all debt paid. Instead we have a broke company trading a quarter of a cent that can't even afford $1,000 to maintain SRSR Nevada corporate registration.
6. No financials have been filed since Dan, Otto took over which greatly retards future potential investors, dampens the stock price in WHAT is the principal , fundamental duties of any public Board of Directors.
7. Dan and Otto couldn't manage themselves out of a wet paper bag. They spent money on a SE Zone winkie drill program (Keevil never used a winkie in Nemegosenda as they are more a toy than a real mineral development drill) never received one iota of information on the program and they still owe the driller $21k among other suffering suppliers.
8. D'Otto's financing for the aborted SE Zone drilling was we think (no one knows because D'Otto are secretive, NOT TRANSPARENT so no PR's or filings, of course) was supplied by debt by the infamous Pottsy who can buy control of the Nemegosenda property (51%) for $250k.
9. D'Otto have amassed large bill from law firms in Colorado and Toronto they can't pay even though they were offered a reasonable settlement from the Plaintiffs.
10. Burnin Byrnes talks about a Keevil pump and dump when Scott has never sold a share, even now . However, Dan has been trading SRSR shares like a madman since 2008. One of the highlights in the Toronto courtroom will be be Dan having to reveal all his SRSR trading,.
11. Burnin Byrnes has put the corporate capabilities of SRSR in jeopardy as, by law, any lawsuit (like the New York Department of Labour
lawsuit) that has anything to do with the company as a director must be revealed to FINRA immediately wqhen the lawsuit is filed. . Burnin Byrnes never bothered so FINRA will not approve any major dealing in SRSR while Dan is a director of SRSR (apparently he isn't anymore, but it s hard to tell as D'Otto do not supply any info whatsoever to suffering shareholders) or Nio Star.
12. Dan Byrnes invited Otto Pichler, another ignorant madman onto the board in 2016. In September 2016 he told Tor, a Lithium representative, that asking Otto onto the board was "the worst mistake of my life". So SRSR shareholders are stuck with two directors (no one with any sense would have have an even amount of directors on a BOD as there could be a deadlock as like, now)that hate each other. Great!
13. In the absence of recent financials one wonders if any tax returns have been filed either for Nio Star or SRSR. If not, which is probable, the CRA (Canadian Revenue Agency, the Canadian equivalent of the American IRS)and the OSC (Ontario Securities Commission) as well as other regulatory bodies will not be very happy.
14. Burnin Byrnes couldn't even , for no money, used ASSESSED mineral credits on Nemegosenda and transferred those credits to the contiguous leases surrounding Nemegosenda. Dan didn't consult with someone who knows how exploration property management works, didn't ask anyone, thought he knew everything, as per usual, and he lost 4 valuable claims by being ignorant of how mineral exploration is done in Ontario.
15. Burnin Byrnes asserts that he can't do financial disclosures because the 'books' are wrong. Even though these 'errant books' were audited by an accredited auditor and the CRA. Interesting. If that is true why doesn't Dan Byrnes retract his signature from the 2013 Nio Star audit that he signed? Without that step the Ontario judge will laugh him out of court.
There are many more Dan and Otto disaster that I could describe but,"I got blisters on my fingers"!!
Dan Byrnes: Big Hat, No Cattle.
AI
