InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 209
Posts 32094
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2009

Re: Carini post# 68630

Tuesday, 05/22/2018 8:44:35 PM

Tuesday, May 22, 2018 8:44:35 PM

Post# of 81740
I was wrong when I said "the filing's a mess"...it's horrendous and OTCMarkets should reject it for a dozen different reasons not the least of which being that isn't signed/certified by ANYONE. So I expect that I was wrong about this as well..."the Yield sign should go tomorrow"...unless OTCMarkets is so sloppy that they don't even look for a signature.

The financials themselves are full of "mistakes" (benefit of the doubt assumption applied liberally) and the Notes appear to be a copy and paste of the year end notes with very little discussion of the quarter they are supposed to explain. There's even a Subsequent Events section that identifies the 50M shares issued to AP even though it obviously occurred WITHIN the quarter.

I could go on...it's an abomination and the new directors should be thrilled that they signed on just in time for it.
Just a note about auditors. They don't audit or express an opinion on interim reports, just the annuals, but they typically perform a quarterly review. Any qualified accountant with a modicum of integrity reviewing these financials wouldn't let a client file them without threatening to resign.

But can it core A apple?
Yes Ralph, of course it can core A apple.