InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 218
Posts 38765
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/29/2008

Re: Dina post# 31585

Friday, 05/18/2018 4:26:58 PM

Friday, May 18, 2018 4:26:58 PM

Post# of 31979
And again, toxic lenders won't lend companies money unless they have TONS of shares available to convert at low prices. They don't "require" anything, UNLESS YOU WANT TOXIC LOANS FROM THEM.

If you think Brett isn't skilled in the toxic debt game and didn't let the shell owner know he would only buy if there was enough room to issue hundreds of millions of new shares, I suggest you check out PNTV.

Here's the money MJVP raised as Geotraq. p.5.
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/sec-filings/10329144/content/html

They had no business, so they didn't need toxic notes. If Brett goes with the "no business, no revenue" model then yeah, he too may not need toxic debt. But that doesn't seem likely. And it still won't support a $1+ share price.

It's just another stinky pinkie sucker bet.

"There's a sucker born every minute, 2 to take him and 4 to lend him toxic debt" PT Barnum's investment advisor.