InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 91
Posts 8838
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2005

Re: DangFool post# 371279

Thursday, 05/17/2018 2:41:08 PM

Thursday, May 17, 2018 2:41:08 PM

Post# of 380529
It's no wonder Foley was pissed about the court documents filed from Gulas that mentioned the Bridgeport loan. He claimed that information was proprietary and filed multiple emergency motions with the court to have it quashed.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=133918643

And I guess the court agreed, because they are no longer available.
David was fine putting the $21 million on NTEK's financials, but was scared shitless when Gulas revealed the actual company in court docs.
--------------------
But re-using Bridgeport is bright-line fraud.

If a criminal referral for fraud came down after the Gulas data dump, on the basis of Bridgeport not existing and Steve Orifice not signing that document at all, Foley might have been able to claim that he himself was bamboozled by some con man calling himself Steve Orifice.

That's a whole heck of a lot harder to argue after more than a year. We're to believe that never, in over a year of negotiations for $21 million, did it ever occur to Foley to try calling the number that's printed clearly on the Bridgeport letter of intent, and thereby discover that it's disconnected and that Bridgeport does not exist.

So much safer, then, to make up some vague investor company name and don't give people any contact information.

This is a clearer and sharper bit of evidence of fraud than taking photos of empty NP-1 boxes and claiming that 60,000 units were already in the retail chain.