.....fascinating, but a rehash of the presentations made to tommy mac and martinez........agency relationships......???........TAA ambiguity.......???........debtor-creditor.....????.....all nonsense, imo....
.....note that haynes said uwbi could have used the money outside of BK, without challenge by the FDIC, etc.........haynes says that the FDIC wants to create a "non-code, case-law precedence"........and the 'richards' case absolutely does not apply......bec. it was not in BK, at a minimum.........
....3 a/judges seem shocked that the FDIC even claimed it was due the ITR........so late in the game......
....NO CHARTER...............NO TAA APPLIES.............
....FDIC's Joe Brooks.........says TAA is silent on ITR..........agency relationship NA, as well......same old fascist CRAP, imo............
.....3 judges appear uncomfortable with this Brooks AH.........
................BANK SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN SEIZED...........
