but wait, our claim here is not about the 'value' of this sham company or the 2 clowns running it as you say. isn't it about the contractual obligations concerning financial instruments, the uniform commercial code, etc? So who cares about the company value or the unethical morons 'running' it. Correct? So why attack the Tennessee court award that way?
If a court in Tennessee saw it that way, i can respect that, even though the award was set aside. And I guess it wasn't going to stand, and didn't.
Given the chance, I think the average jury would be thoroughly righteously fuming at what these brokers have done (& the passive DTC), and given the legal venue to rule on it, would award the shareholders a very significant settlement amount per share (not too far removed from the Tennessee court), not crumbs.
Thanks for what you are doing, mretgnol. On to Rome.
IMHO
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^