InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 849
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/14/2017

Re: I-Glow post# 139242

Wednesday, 05/09/2018 7:22:36 PM

Wednesday, May 09, 2018 7:22:36 PM

Post# of 203917
Since you have asked me to "post what [YOU] have missed in the 8-K", please answer this first:

If I post what you are wrong about and challenge your false claims, will I be wasting my time, or will you actually provide the section (i.e. Item#, Exhibit#) of the 8-K where it actually says what your claims are?

You're pure speculation and false claims are meaningless to me.

Let's stick to the FACTS.

In the past you have not been able to back up your false claims with FACTS.

For example:

In a previous post of yours, you stated this:

I-GLOW wrote:
"What part about OWCP providing a Fraudulent Opinion Letter to expedite the removal of the restrictive legend are you ignoring."


I replied with this very simple question (in bold):
Where does it say this in the SEC document? Paragraph and page please.

....crickets

Then I came to the conclusion that you must be struggling with that so I added:
"I'll settle for just the paragraph numbers"

....crickets


If I post what you are wrong about in the 8-K, will you actually provide the section (i.e. Item#, Exhibit#) of the 8-K where it actually says what your claims are?




$OWCP



YOU ARE A GHOST DRIVING A MEAT COATED SKELETON MADE FROM STARDUST RIDING A ROCK FLOATING THROUGH SPACE.
FEAR NOTHING!