Cannabix Technologies Inc (BLOZF)

[x1power]

Hound system may present legal challenges due to having to prove legally
that the chosen chemical used in it is free of impurities during manufacturing process..
Or, that there is not an additive multiple error of contamination involving wherein (locality environment at roadside sampling) is negating factor in reliability of said sampling.

A legal team might say . . . 'our client was confused and agitated and remembers hyper-ventilating just before the sample was given'.

This is why I emphasized the need for actual roadside breathe testing (e.g. Border portals), to establish a real time plus and minus legally accepted and medically correct, deviation range for such breathe reading
devices. <---to be agreed upon by all parties prior to the start of
the Federal Law. <-- if ones breathe falls within this accepted range, no contest is possible. And, all sides to this accepted range decision will fight for an advantage thereof, for their side.

Which brings us retail investors back to the notion of having to decide
to take any PR effect (if it happens), or maybe keeping some shares for the long term.

BLOZF system of MS breathe reader may be superior to Hound system, as
court challenges may call for a MS comparing regardless?

I would suggest this is why we need a big bucks and tech and legal staffed partner, to carry off this tech wonder. It has wider market
implications for other mobile reader use.