InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 210
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/09/2015

Re: shell3 post# 22118

Wednesday, 05/09/2018 8:57:36 AM

Wednesday, May 09, 2018 8:57:36 AM

Post# of 27593
Huge difference in approach. The hound labs approach is an application of analytical chemistry - a subject I barely passed. The little I remember involved precise measurements of substances on very small scales. Even as a repetetive process it is a daunting task to analyze a breath sample using their method in a laboratory setting. If they develop a device, the legal challenges I would forsee would focus on the calibration of the dosing and measuring parts of the device. The solutions need to be added at very specific, repeatable ratios.

Also, they say this in the abstract - Chemical compositions and methods provide labeling, detection and measurement of target substances in exhaled human breath, and can be implemented in connection with a handheld device—much like a Breathalyzer portable breath testing unit for alcohol.

So are they developing a handheld device, or a process that will be implemented using a room sized device that is used (in connection with) a handheld device? Important details.

Good find. The main difference is we are using FAIMS technology where the sample is directly analyzed to see what is in it. They are using a wet analytical process involving many outside reagents and solutions. I think the Cannabix device will be less subject to legal challenges. We'll see.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BLOZF News