Wednesday, May 09, 2018 12:31:49 AM
https://www.nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=tLY8eqHkiTTbg3dfS79h5A%253d%253d&CorpName=VICTORY+MARINE+HOLDINGS+CORP.
but I can't find where the split was ever approved by FINRA.
According to the last public disclosure done by the previous shell owners from early 2013 the share structure was as follows in early 2013:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/VMHG/disclosure
450,065,000 shares outstanding
449,765,000 shares restricted
300,000 shares free trading
But after Rhona Keaveney hijacked the abandoned shell in August/September of 2017 and sold the shell to Orlando Hernandez, Hernandez reported the share structure as follows:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/VMHG/disclosure
15,002,516 shares outstanding
14,533,931 shares restricted
468,585 shares free trading
According to the 2018 OTC disclosures, the drastic change in the share structure from early 2013 to early 2017 was caused because of a 1:30 reverse split from May 18, 2010.
But there is no 1:30 reverse split from 2010 listed on the OTC markets website.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/VMHG/security
I don't entirely trust the OTC markets site. It could be they left off the corporate action, but the fact that the old owners of the shell did OTC filings during 2011, 2012, and early 2013 that never reflected any 1:30 reverse split pretty much confirms to me that no split was ever approved by FINRA.
If FINRA never approved that reverse split how can it be put into effect now, more than 7 years later, by the new owners of the shell? It makes no sense to me and I can't imagine the transfer agent, Columbia Stock Transfer Company, can be that stupid or that irresponsible. So maybe I'm missing where the split was approved.
I've been going back through the history of the shell some and I see where Viking Investments Group LLC (Tom Simeo) was issued 40,250,000 shares back in 2007. Those shares started becoming free trading after 2013 which is why the float actually went up some despite the mysterious 1:30 reverse split from 2010 being applied to the share structure by the new owners.
Assuming the split is legit (and not being done without FINRA approval) and was just never property reported by anybody anywhere, Tom Simeo would have 1,341,000 shares so the float could end up closer to 1,347,000 than the 468,585 shares last reported by the new owners.
If the reverse split can't be applied because FINRA never approved it then obviously we are looking at a float that could end up as big as 40,550,000 shares.
This reverse split is a major issue and would have a massive impact on the float so that's why I'm asking for help trying to sort out if the 1:30 reverse split from 2010 ever really happened or not. I've also contacted FINRA to ask their help.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM