InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 737
Posts 76043
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/01/2012

Re: Doc Holliday post# 139073

Tuesday, 05/08/2018 2:07:47 PM

Tuesday, May 08, 2018 2:07:47 PM

Post# of 203913
That isn't completely accurate - "Defendants coordinated their sales of (stated stocks) with aggressive promotions of the stocks over the Internet and via social media."

"By virtue of the conduct alleged herein, Defendants, directly or indirectly, singly
or in concert, have engaged and, unless restrained and enjoined will continue to engage in acts, practices, schemes and courses of business that constitute violations of Section 17(a)(1) and (3)13 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)(1) and (3)] and Sections 9(a)(1) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 78i(a) and 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c) thereunder [17 C.F.R.§ 240.10b-5(a) and (c)]."

"XXXX was also promoted by Mrowca on the Investors Hub web site under the user name “HotStockAce.”" (3 years in Federal prison)

Frontloaders on iHub are engaging in securities fraud when that actively promote such stocks as OWCP - they don't care about the truth or facts - just posting such nonsense such as Teva was going to acquire the OWCP patents that didn't exist.

Your definition is much more closely related to libel than securities fraud.

IG

"Are you gonna pull those pistols or whistle Dixie?"