InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 210
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/15/2015

Re: nowwhat2 post# 6374

Thursday, 05/03/2018 1:16:53 PM

Thursday, May 03, 2018 1:16:53 PM

Post# of 10478
False facts don't cut it, Nowhat.

The only thing in your post that's accurate is your ironic and long awaited admission that "past performance is no indication of future performance." I couldn't agree more. But the entire basis for your charts is LAC's purported "past performance," from which you believe you can extrapolate to predict the future performance of a junior mining company still in the process of gearing up for lithium production (a lot of lithium production). No way. Simply too many variables and unknowns, none of which you consider. Instead, and paradoxically, you ridicule DD and facts when they are brought to your attention, along with the wisdom/teachings of extremely successful investors/businessmen like Warren Buffett and Rick Rule. Wow! How telling.

And if you want to get into LAC's past performance, at least get it right and be intellectually honest. You claim that LAC has fallen close to 60% in your post. False; not this year. According to Schwab, you're nearly 18% off, with LAC being down YTD approximately 42.46%. And if you want to chart a trend for LAC, how about charting, and accurately reporting that LAC's trend is UP, with LAC being UP approximately 3.13% over the last month, while the overall market (did you really talk about the DOW crashing in one of your posts?) crapped out.

I think you should stop passing off your charts as being based in any way, shape or form on anything reliable as far as LAC goes and I, for one, could care less about your Blackberry chart, which is way off the reservation. Stock specific board here, remember?

GLTA! LAC longggggg!!!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LAAC News