MMEX Resources Corp (MMEX)

[jmjjw]

Circular logic, and circular, unsubstantiated claims fail to advance MMEX’s case.

If anyone were able to provide a link to an 8-K regarding a “term sheet,” etc., or related SEC data, it would have been done to put this matter to rest.

There is no SEC filing on MMEX’s part regarding a “term sheet.” Similarly, there is no SEC filing regarding any material definitive agreement related to off-take, supply, or related contracts.

For those unfamiliar with contract law, in order to form a valid, legally binding contract, the parties to the contract must have the capability to perform. Using supply as an example, MMEX could not form a contract for crude supply, because it has no production facility. Similarly, on the off-take, or production side, MMEX has no capability to produce anything (recall it has no business operations). Therefore, MMEX cannot form a legally binding, valid contract to sell a product, because it lacks the ability to perform - i.e., it cannot produce a product.

“Agreements” for off-take are of no value, because they are not legally binding contracts, and cannot be enforced - an “agreement” has no consideration involved, and has no economic value.

Today, while I was visiting Miller’s in Fort Stockton, I formed an agreement with a gentleman I met to purchase all the tasty unicorn meat he was willing to sell me - this unicorn meat off-take agreement, and sales of all the tasty unicorn meat will make me billions of dollars. I plan to take over a shell corporation on the OTC next week to sell shares in my unicorn meat product company.

But I digress. For closure, please provide a link specific to an SEC filing, that directly references MMEX’s “term sheet,” containing that “term sheet” as an addendum to the filing. Lacking that evidence, please provide a link to a verifiable reference containing the “term sheet,” including the identification of the unnamed “international debt fund,” and the terms of the debt deal.