InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 650
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/13/2011

Re: wildwertski post# 11178

Monday, 04/23/2018 3:19:25 PM

Monday, April 23, 2018 3:19:25 PM

Post# of 11962
I was a bit surprised that this was an American power company in that I didn't think the United States had the financial incentives to switch to Biocoal that the EU did. Perhaps the requirements for low sulfur coal make biocoal a feasible alternative when considering transportation costs. On the other hand, the press release did mention reducing CO2 so the power producer could be in a state that has state mandated CO2 reduction requirements. Funny that they didn't mention who the producer was. The company doesn't like it when shareholders contact public agencies they have agreements with, but I wouldn't think that power producers are subject to the same public information requests that municipalities have. If they did, I would contact them so it's probably a good thing they kept the power company's name out of the press release.

Phillip