from another board, posted by cindyyoohoo, I believe:
<What huge naked short position? the first "reported" NOBO was incorrect. There never were that many shares shorted. They just went poof. There certainly were not 75 million shares that covered between the dates of these two lists. So where did they go? they were never there in the first place. It was a magic trick - now you see it now you don't.
dates on the website.
9/13/2006
#nobo = 15,184
# of shares = 106,405,424
DTCC # = 30,918,339 ( reported on 9/19/06)
10/03/06
#nobo = 4,911
#shares = 39,278,507
DTCC # 37,589,733 ( as reported on 9/29/06)
Why the difference in # shareholders?
Why the difference in #shares?
refer to my post where I reposted the post from a shareholder and the proof that a shareholder had received the info pre Mike alexanders rant on that interview that ADP had no right disclosing that info to a shareholder and that they>
