Can you show the data that you're using to support there is a coordinated person or group accumulating shares here?
Or are you just guessing based on volume (which isn't proof).
I did ask this before but I didn't see an answer. Maybe I missed it?
Where you are stuck in your daily question is no one sees anything here as a slam dunk, exponential increase in pps like you do. Possible? Sure, slam dunk...not at all. This is a penny stock.
That is why no one at this stage, with the resources to buy, have done so lately.
No one. Because it's not the deal you think it is. Yes, that is what I'm telling you (before you even type...."you mean to tell me that if a+b then c+d=pps to $0.10 is a slam dunk").
The two entities who have come forward were not able to negotiate a deal with Parsi. So, those opportunities have passed.
I can tell you it's not a slam dunk as well. Random volume doesn't mean anything coordinated is happening unless you have someone who announced they are doing so, which you have not supplied.
Parsi didn't start $GIGL wanting to be in the position they are in now. But he is backed into a corner by way of consequences of their mistakes with few options left and getting more scarce as days go by.
That's why you cannot fathom the current state of the business. Parsi is pivoting what he's doing. He has no choice.
Stop thinking that anything with this company is a slam dunk and you may get unstuck from that thought process. There's a reason that after asking that question 100 times that you don't have an answer you like. You've ignored answers that don't fit your narrative.
Change your narrative as the landscape changes, that's what good investors do.
Stock manipulation according to the SEC. "Making false or misleading statements about a company."
