InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 131
Posts 4727
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/10/2004

Re: rawman post# 3572

Tuesday, 04/17/2018 1:43:14 PM

Tuesday, April 17, 2018 1:43:14 PM

Post# of 6557
Yep. And all you need to do is realize that there is a LOT more revenue stream in the small item market represented by the crypto mining hardware than there is in the sale of individual multi-million dollar machines.

The way to win a baseball game is to get people on base and advanced around the bases. Oh... I know it takes fielding & pitching & all that, but talking only of whether you regularly win by hitting home runs or by getting men on base.....

Here.... look at it this way: the first tall building in New York city was the Woolworth Building. Woolworth was the "five & dime" company. Bsck then, they were called "dime stores". Kin of like Dollar Tree orr Dollar General today. The skyline of New York city, and that of every major city to this day was FIRST changed by a building built by a company that was the leading dime store company in America. Lesson learned, people. Lesson learned.

There are two philosophies going head to head here: my conviction that the way to make a winner is via regular, small units VS the sexier idea that you make the big ass WHAMBAM-WHAMMO deal that is the prototypical home run deal.

I obviously think that big deal dependence is a lead weight rather than a winning strategy.

DPW is small company that is trying to be a conglomerate by taking on lots of debt, and it has three main arenas it plays in:

1.) large item sales in a technology owned by another company and consisting of a machine that still needs market penetration and still needs actual sales placement/installations,

2.) crypto power supplies, consisting of small item sales in a manufacturing arena that is hot at the moment (crypto) where the company owns the industry leadership and where it controls its own reputation PLUS ownership & operation of mining machines (including low electric costs via ownership of a hydro-electric dam in New York state),

3.) military contracting, where it owns the manufacturing facilities and where contracts & relationships already exist.

IF there is a big deal and IF the market penetration in that area materializes and IF the sales are repeat sales and so on and so on
VS.
actual repeat item sales in a market they excel in AND ongoing military contracts they have lengthy relationships in.....

I know which avenue I prefer, regardless of puff piece paid for articles.

I mean, I'll take a big ass machine sale deal if it gets done & if it actually does not sop up the cash the company has and if it does not end up actually costing more than anticipated.....

....but I'll make a living a nickle and a dime at a time over the big deal avenue every day of the week, including Sunday.

Senior Ault trumpets the big deal in paid articles as his first and foremost route. My thought is "well, what would one expect of this guy?"

I mean, watching this guy set himself up with huge contractor pay tells me that he is logically to be expected to prefer deals that are big and impressive over Smalsville deals that are bread and butter for the ordinary chap out there.

Imperial Whazoo

Afterthought:
And lest someone say I'm overlooking it... they just created a lending company to seed businesses. that may or may not be a money maker. It's proly a pretty good thing, but the deals it finances are more likely to be crypto deals that the big item deals, so that actually further buttresses my thinking.

All my opinions, folks, but its not a set of ideas that are devoid of thoughtfullness, and I actually hold a pretty sizable position, so I DO have a dog in this fight.

"Just my opinions, folks. Do your own due diligence & make your own decisions. DO NOT... I repeat... DO NOT make any investment decisions on my comments. They are my opinions. That's all they are... OPINIONS."