All the things I've read that allege to show proof of "this, that and the other, regards vplm, are weak or just non sequiturs. The FACT is, that its TRUE that the effectiveness, necessity and thus value, have never, in any way shape or form, been shown, let alone proven. That's not being negative. That's stating the facts. Sure some certain accomplishments said to be proofs of efficacy, need & value, but that does not make it so. A judge ruling for those things, specifically, would be the closest thing to proof that could be had and even then, as has been shown by certain judges, such rulings do not really constitute proof. That's why such rulings are so often overturned inside out & upside down.
I am correct for for stating there is no proof because there isn't. Me saying: well, getting patents is not proof because getting patent does provide proof of anything more than the application has met the USPTO criteria to be awarded a patent, or, well, the IPRs are not proof of anything beyond holding up the original determinations, by the USPTO, which allowed the patent award in the 1st place,
and me repeating it many times is not because of some ocd thing, it's because it keeps being denied as the truth.
The words "efficacy", "necessity" and "value" all have definite meanings and what vplm has accomplished does not constitute those definitions or meanings. That's all I'm saying. That is not being "negative", it is being "positive" about what I see and think and say about it. When something is worthy of a positive sentiment about company related matters, I always state that as well, such as the IPR wins, the sawyer letters, the lawsuits being initiated, etc etc. Those positive sentiments are ignored. I know why but I can't say why...
The fact that vplm has not ever produced any proof whatsoever of the efficacy, need and value, AND it being a pennystock, AND it showing a pps downtrend approx 95 percent of the time, AND having no real business operations for 5 hrs except to develop & sell/license patents, AND many many inconsistencies in the news, PRs, "infomercials", etc, that HAVE IN FACT been published, AND so many other reasons as well...is enough to have a right to and a reason to and a certain prudence, to call the whole thing into question. And rightfully so. Especially if it's seen as perfectly ok to hear 95 percent of the time (approx) everything "positive" about the company. If thst is ok, and has gone on daily for years, then my backed up, fully validated not so positive sentiment about the company is just as ok.
It is also a true fact that given the record of all pennystocks over many years time, no matter what their "story" is and no matter how many so called "proofs" and promises and touts and assurances of the great rewards to come, the FACT remains the actual and true odds for vplm to bring all the many billions of dollars and for the patents to take up total control of the communications industry as a whole, is, well, it's just infinitesimal. Doesnt mean it's not possible for the miracle to happen & it doesn't mean that vplm hasn't worked hard to get to where they are now, but the chances are far slimmer than the way its being portrayed. Plus, it looks like it's going to have to be tried in court, because nobody wants to buy or license, and the chances there, are in contrast, that any final outcome will take years and years.
