lowtrade

[lowtrade]

This turned out to be longer and more confusing then I expected when I started my replay.

What you see as selling, I see as buying or (accumulation) So here's why. Friday while the price was at .0008 there was huge accumulation. As I recall there was a 27 mil trade @ .0008 around 2:30/3pm. with bid .0008 ask .0009. Yes that was a sell. But also accumulation, as the volume for the day (until that point) was under 5 mil. And the day ended at 92 mil. Thus while the .0008 low area was sold strong! For someone (including you & I) it became accumulation at lows.


Today 90% of trades were at .0008. Ps; I bought the close today @ .0009 after adding again at .0008 earlier, to see if the market makers wanted the chart to close negative again. And they did not fill my order off market, but put it through on the electronic trading platform.

This action on my part was to judge any manipulation since the .001 support was broken. And my conclusion is it's free trading with retail getting bored.

Now about boredom, at the OTC. Rule of thumb is if the big guys which caused the previous (attention pop in price) doesn't run it before 4 weeks, retail will move out. It's been 3 weeks and the move out has started. End of week 3 92mil volume spike day and today (start of week 4) with weak, but average volume @ 11mil.

IMO the possible positive I've been seeing is a major 92 mil volume accumulation of someone big; buying this retail boredom move out. By showing my last minute buy the ask to close high for the day. IMO M&Ms have no desire to get more accumulation for the darkside. A good sign.

-------------------------------------------------------------

How the hell can I explain where I'm coming from more clear?

First you must understand I believe this trade is a gamble, a possible darkside manipulated play. Not stock trade! IMO someone within the management and/or funder (The darkside) has and will create runs, to give the funding deal it's ROI upfront. If I'm correct, it will run again. If wrong, it will eventually walk down to .0001.

What's most important for this theory is timing of volume and price more then price climb or retreat. Matter of fact look at RNVA it ran in week 4 after the attention price pop. http://schrts.co/pjTZhV This is normal for a driven/manipulated run on the OTC. Note the price and volume walk down week 3 there.

In the past, if I see boredom moving out in week 3. I really want to see the move out accumulated rather then volume interest walking down slowly. Walking down slow means no big guy participation. And odds are it's not a real darkside play. CLKA differed with RNVA in the huge volume day the end of week 3. If I see large accumulation on large volumes moving out. That gives me some comfort the darkside want's the retail herd around longer. If RNVA didn't run week 4 I'd call it a mistake and dump. One more note is CLKA's volume spike end of week 3 may be a signal it may run week 5 not 4. Have to watch.

You see; Retail does NOT buy retraces, they buy runs. So 2 days ago, when we saw 92 mil sold, THUS we saw 92 mil bought. And not only bought, but bought large. 27 mil in 1 trade. Little guys just don't buy that much in a price down turn on week 3.

This is NOT a call to buy. It's my expectations that a possible manipulated OTC run may occur. This week? Next week? It's up to when the darkside is setup where they want to be. And all my bull chit in this post is only saying, I still believe it's in darkside play mode.