InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 1210
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/10/2005

Re: None

Monday, 04/09/2018 10:30:28 AM

Monday, April 09, 2018 10:30:28 AM

Post# of 51329
I had a hunch that the WSJ blurb's impact was being way over-estimated but I wasn't going to say anything. All sorts of visibility and awareness factors involved, including the article's substance itself: Note that the symbol 'TGLO' is never used, which I consider either a point of active WSJ policy or an utter slip-up by the author or editor.

Also note that the article is mostly about TheGlobe's history and travails, while saying practically nothing about Delfin's monster stake in LNG-export. Not to mention the tongue-in-cheek tone, akin to those little amusing-diversion articles featured on the bottom of the front page of every issue.

I did love this line though: "Delfin had better hope for more staying power the second time around" [emphasis added].
Which to me implies that the chance of a TGLO/Delfin chimera going stratospheric again is being taken very seriously -- at least by the author.