It is all a gamble Bear,
There is no guarantee that BICX will be successful, but you have to like the direction that things are beginning to shape up in the fight against opiate addiction.
The first warning shot in the battle has been fired by the government. "Surgeon General urges more Americans carry Naloxone to fight opioid crisis"
So the next question is what do you plan to do with these addicts once you save them from near death?
Do you believe the government will not intervene in their lives once they labeled an overdose risk?
As a treatment what do you think the government would most TRUST a near death addict to remain compliant with? Daily taking of naltrexone? Showing up at a Doctors office once a month for an injection? Or an implant that works for up to 6 months?
This is why the Ohio case is so so so important. If it bears out being successful long term, BICX102 very well could become the treatment of choice recommend and paid for by the US government, state governments, county governments and local governments.
Especially, if it proves to be far far cheaper than incarceration, reducing court cost by reducing repeat offenders in the court, reducing medical cost to Federal, States and Local keeping repeating offenders out of the ER and hospital and reducing the cost of law enforcement by reducing the number of response calls involving the same addict over and over again.
Not to mention the cost to society that would be saved, by reducing the crimes committed by repeat offenders in order to get money to pay for their addiction.
Comparing what the BICX102 treatment will save the system, makes the paying the cost of the treatment a wise economic decision for all branches of government?
Wouldn't you agree?
This is the future I see for BICX and that is why I am long.
