The problem with a yes/no device is that it is much easier to develop. For all we know, the folks over at dogsnose have a magic box that gives a yes/no and they are trying to make it into a percent and recency of use device. A spit swab could probably be devleoped to do a yes/no device. I do agree that a yes/no would serve a majority of purposes, but I think that from the cannabix technologies perspective that it is more lucrative to keep putting the word out there that a percent and recency of use device is right around the corner, because it keeps the end users keyed up waiting for it instead of breaking and going to a yes/no device. There will eventually be one or more percent/recency of use devices on the market. Some will be better than others. If it's a mystery device that the maker refuses to disclose principles of operation it will be viewed with much skepticism by courts and employment lawyers. The cannabix device uses technology that (1) will stand up to legal scrutiny because industry experts in the field will understand how it works and validate it as a working technology (expert witnesses),(2)is sufficiently complicated so as to keep casual counterfieters from making cheap knockoffs in asian sweatshops, and (3) is protected by patents to keep the larger companies at bay.
In perspective, the market has been in turmoil. We are entering a trade war with one of our largest trading partners. This stock is nothing special until they produce a marketable device. Personally I'm ahead. My average price per share is just below 22 cents. If it dips lower, I may pick up more. We'll see.
