InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 1484
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/19/2005

Re: lojack post# 10136

Wednesday, 04/04/2018 4:10:49 PM

Wednesday, April 04, 2018 4:10:49 PM

Post# of 41910
Probably because it is NOT a PO, but an agreement to purchase, probably a telephone call. Retraction soon to follow. Even if it is a firm PO, the "exclusive" part means that Petsmart and PetCo cant sell in CA! Not GOOD!