OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp (OWCP)

[I-Glow]

You really need to read the Complaint that the SEC filed against Friedland et el - because it clearly states that OWCP provided a fraudulent 144 opinion letter for Friedland.

It is obvious that you don't understand the function of a TA - they can't remove the restrictive legend on a stock certificate early without getting written approval from OWCP.

From the SEC Complaint.

"On or around August 18, 2014, OWC provided an opinion letter to its transfer agent from a disbarred attorney in connection with its issuance of stock to Intiva."

"Pursuant to the compensation terms of the Global PR/IR Agreement, OWC
transferred 5,134,375 OWC shares to Global on February 5, 2016. OWC provided an attorney opinion letter to OWC’s transfer agent from a disbarred attorney in connection with the issuance of OWC’s stock to Global."

"OWC disclosed in reports it filed with the SEC in February 2016 that
Global owned these shares of stock – 6.3% of OWC’s common stock at that time – and that Friedland controlled them as Global’s President and CEO, but neither OWC, Friedland, nor Global made any disclosure as to how the shares were acquired by Global."

But you posted the following:

No. He's still lying. It was Friedland that used the disbarred lawyer's letter

You do understand that the OWCP management/insiders had to approve the Opinion Letter and provide written confirmation to the TA before the restrictive legend could be removed - read the entire complaint - as you can see above - "OWC provided an attorney opinion letter to OWC’s transfer agent from a disbarred attorney..."

The SEC is very clear that OWCP was complicit in the fraud!

Sorry but I am not the one lying! LOLOL!!!

IG