InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 69
Posts 7941
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2015

Re: shell3 post# 21786

Monday, 04/02/2018 11:33:06 PM

Monday, April 02, 2018 11:33:06 PM

Post# of 27639
Maybe...but Dr. Huestis own words could potentially be used to argue against any scientific consensus on impairment numbers. Numbers that could take 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, possibly never to determine. I've been holding long for what I believe to be current advantages of a breathalyzer versus spit testing.

To say "they" will never combine impairment numbers for multiple controlled substances would be a stretch. All I'm saying is it likely will not be a scientific consensus but rather a govermnent imposed end to justify the means. The scientific community will just recieve more governmental handouts to push other pet projects. None the wiser. @ the end of the day, it's all about the benjamins.



/////AMGETMONEY

It's A Real Movie



Take Your Best Screenshot

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BLOZF News