saprolities If there is one thing that rings loudly about your reason for being here, it is your intent to hurt DNI. Your unwillingness to answer questions about how CGM's actions and mis actions, may have affected the business relationship speaks to us. You see, when one avoids the issues from one side, and exaggerates the issues from the other side, so as to suit only his purpose, he loses his credibility and ability to have any affect on others.
Saprolities we are seeing right through to your poor character. CGM CEO Randal Swick refuses to accept any responsibility and looks only to be here, to cause doubts and deception as well. Since you collectively as a group are trying so hard to hurt DNI, you can see where we would have doubts about anything you say, and why we might even think you as a group, had something to do with Mining Watch, the Sumofus bogus piece, the and possibly the sabotaging of the bull dozer.
Again Ill ask, Since you say you are a CGM shareholder, are you happy with the fact that, CGM claims things were difficult, yet they relied on just one driller, and one RC drill, to protect their interest, whereas they had agreed and were responsible to run, manage and work the project to specifications in the contract?
Do you think in light of these alleged difficulties that CGM claimed, they should have sent another employee and that Management (Randal Swick) should have taken a trip to the property?
DNI CEO Dan Weir was there for at least 10 days per month. In your opinion, why didn't, or why couldn't Randal come to the site for even one day? Are you happy with this? For me, it Speaks volumes, as to the importance he gave this project, and to his credibility when claiming he acted responsibly?