InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,480.90
(
0.05%
)
US TECH 100
19,261.20
(
0.24%
)
Dow Jones
39,205.81
(
0.20%
)
Brent Oil
84.95
(
0.56%
)
Bitcoin
61,740.80
(
1.50%
)
Post# of 49370
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

james885

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 11
Posts 2262
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/12/2014

james885

Re: None

Sunday, 04/01/2018 4:30:04 AM

Sunday, April 01, 2018 4:30:04 AM

Post# of 49370

How about providing proof of this nonsense:

"Several recent cases suggest the SEC is now recommending that issuers who want to make things right should accept revocation, and then get two years of audited filings in order and file a new Form 10. That has the advantage of relieving the company from the obligation to catch up with dozens of old financial reports"

Please provide any facts or DD to suggest this is true.


But the nonsense you posted about the SEC is recommending the companies accept the revocation just isn't true.




https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132942380
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up