InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 2159
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/22/2009

Re: mog1962 post# 14847

Saturday, 03/31/2018 9:48:14 AM

Saturday, March 31, 2018 9:48:14 AM

Post# of 15274
Mog

You've made some fair points. I feel the gig difference here between Stan and Conrad is credibilityy. Mir has poisoned the well. No one will give him money and for good reason. He didn't deliver on the government contract he touted. He has no credibility with personnel,sales people,creditors ,doctors, researchers etc etc because he doesn't pay them and then lies about it. He prefers to pay attorneys. He loves to play the legal system although he has lost every case. Big talker no credibility. He could give a rats ass about anyone but himself. He could care less about the shareholders.

Stan has people that will give him money right now. Look at Stan't track record. He actually has one. He has made many people alot of money over the years. Stan tells the truth. Stan has 40 years of successful Sales and marketing. Stan has a PHD. He is a great negotiator. STAN HAS CREDIBILITY! Who has a better chance for success here?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.