InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,178.00
(
-0.45%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
-0.66%
)
Bitcoin
60,242.47
(
-2.22%
)
Post# of 6903
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

mmoy

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 10
Posts 10150
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/22/2002

mmoy

Re: KeithDust2000 post# 5357

Wednesday, 10/11/2006 6:39:37 PM

Wednesday, October 11, 2006 6:39:37 PM

Post# of 6903
Interesting. Some nice stuff in there and some disappointments
but they need to put some numbers together on performance improvements compared to Intel's or AMD's current offerings.

And maybe characterize what kinds of workloads would benefit
from various features. From my desktop perspective, I still
would prefer a dual-core to a quad-core until I can see some
substansive benefits to quad-core. I know that there are users
that benefit from QC now. But I'm not one of them.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up