InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 682
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/26/2013

Re: leifsmith post# 29350

Thursday, 03/22/2018 4:56:34 PM

Thursday, March 22, 2018 4:56:34 PM

Post# of 30990
leifsmith

We have no way of knowing if PURE ANATABINE is 115% more effective than anatabine citrate because no study results have been provided to substantiate it. Back in the days when googling anatabine only brought up chemical companies, it was my (maybe mistaken) impression that pure anatabine was toxic because those chemical companies could only sell it to labs which were certified to handle it.

Whatever PURE ANATABINE is, Preditor Nutrition is boldly claiming that it is 115% more effective than anatabine citrate, and dosages of PURE ANATABINE as recommended by Preditor are somewhat lower than what they are for anatabine citrate.

My beef was that I had paid for the more effective PURE ANATABINE but received the less effective anatabine citrate. After contacting Preditor several times, they continued to insist that I had received PURE ANATABINE even though the bottle I was holding in my hand said "(as anatabine citrate)". It was obvious that Preditor had no idea what was being delivered. At that point I decided to let it ride, on the slim hope that Jonnie was in the middle of whatever was going on, and that maybe, in the long run, it might work to our advantage via Rock Creek Pharma.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.