Thursday, March 22, 2018 2:54:44 PM
The reason I doubt whether a transaction is really a "buy" or "sell" even when it appears obvious is that market makers exist and can behave in such a way that they are "absorbing" a lot of, say, "sell" orders. Sure, for every transaction there's a buyer and a seller. But if one of those sides, say the buyer, is only the market maker, then that kinda clouds the answer to the question "who's buying?" An entity is buying in that case, yes, but for purposes that are different than a conventional investor's purposes for buying would be. So can we really just look at it and still call it a "buy"? I'm not so sure that makes sense. Is there any way to tell if a transaction was purchased (or sold) by a market maker and not a non-market making investor?
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM