Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[22na22]

No one is trying to "poison the stock for cheapies." Some want to see every realistic timeline and outcome and the effects and outcomes of all of them. Because as an investor you need to make risk-based decisions, not only positive-outcome decisions. Until I see more of you posting legitimate rebuttals and arguments a la abcd, tutter, and stark, all I see is paranoia and refusal of reality. Fact of the matter is the judges ASKED WDDD if they're prepared for a remand and made it very clear they don't want to make any large decisions that would set precedent. And it's obvious this isn't the type of panel to try to create history.

So how are we poisoning the stock by discussing timelines of a remand when the judges BROUGHT UP the remand themselves?