AI
| Followers | 29 |
| Posts | 4116 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 11/08/2005 |
Sunday, March 18, 2018 6:29:47 PM
LMAO!!! Song and Dance! Every Single Day! Still Nothing from Treaty??
Next we'll hear:
800m fake NSS share!
57 failed court cases!
20,000 shareholder!
Financials being filed at the end of the month!
YADA YADA YADA!!
Same Ole Lyin Cryin Lois stories!
The Real Truth!
HTTPS://promotionstocksecrets.com/the-sec-just-suspended-my-stock-now-what/
What the company does only matters if it hopes to resume trading one day. Several recent cases suggest the SEC is now recommending that issuers who want to make things right should accept revocation, and then get two years of audited filings in order and file a new Form 10. That has the advantage of relieving the company from the obligation to catch up with dozens of old financial reports, which might prove an impossible task, but it has the disadvantage of leaving shareholders in the lurch for as long as it takes to get the filings in, find a sponsoring market maker, and get a Form 211 approved by FINRA.
Once registration has been revoked, the stock's ticker will be deleted. Shareholders will still be shareholders, but in a private company. Their stock will be extremely illiquid, and its value will be difficult to determine, as there is no public market for it.
Companies suspended for suspected fraud have usually been quite active in the recent past, and perhaps are currently active. The three most recent suspensions for cause brought by the agency were of Polar Petroleum Corp (POLR), Biozoom, Inc. (BIZM), and Norstra Energy (NORX), all of which had been trading vigorously just before the SEC brought down the hammer.
Yep and the corporation i.e. Treaty can also be held accountable for their Clownfish babblings.
http://info.legalzoom.com/can-company-held-liable-did-wrong-26117.html
Criminal Liability
Like individuals, companies can be held liable for certain crimes like theft and forgery. In order to be found criminally liable, it is not necessary that everyone in the company know about the wrongdoing. The company may be found guilty if at least one of its representatives knew of the wrongdoing and the crime was committed on behalf of the company.
Civil Liability
As with criminal liability, a company can be held civilly liable if one of its agents is acting in the scope of his employment and for the benefit of the corporation when the misdeed occurs. Like criminal liability, there is no requirement that every one of the company's representatives know of the wrongdoing in order for the business to be held liable. Corporate liability may arise if a single agent,(Clownfish), officer or representative is aware of the wrongful conduct.
Vicarious Liability
Under the doctrine of vicarious liability, corporate liability can arise despite the company and its officers having no knowledge of the wrongdoing. This form of liability is a kind of strict liability, which is referred to as "strict" because lack of knowledge is not a proper defense. This doctrine is based on the idea that because a corporation is not a person, it can only act through the conduct of its employees and agents. For example, an air conditioning company may be held liable for damages when one of its repairmen caused an accident because he was rushing to get to a job on time. It makes no difference that none of the company's officers knew of or encouraged the repairman's conduct. (or Clownfish lying on behalf)
Piercing the Corporate Veil
It is not only the corporation that can be held liable for wrongdoing. Although corporate officers are generally protected from liability for the corporation's losses, they may be held liable in certain cases. When corporate officers have disregarded certain formalities that are necessary for the operation of a company -- like failing to follow bookkeeping procedures and commingling personal and business funds -- the corporate form will be disregarded and the individuals will be held personally liable for the losses of the business. Although these officers must have knowledge of the wrongdoing to be held liable, it is not necessary for other employees to also know about it.
And yes folks Jerry's kids are referenced in the court documents also!
278 Email: Blackburn to Ray Amanollahi, Frank
Itak, Mulshine and others Re: 4th revision to
Treaty BELIZE OIL REBUTTAL.doc
(1.31.2012)
SEC-WRD-E-0000029
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 14: All communications between you and Platon Petratos, Frank Itak or Reza M. Amanollahi (a.k.a. Ray Amano).
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 37: All communications between you and Louie Kneitz, Frank or Donny Lelievre.
Case 2:15-cv-02451-CJB-SS Document 133-2 Filed 07/03/16
2 These quotes, published on InverstorHub by kanola to dloggold, were e-mails from Samantha Cox to her friends in the Immigration and Customs office and were inadvertently produced. They then became the subject of a sealed protective motion to return same, Doc.lOO, which was GRANTED by the Magistrate on October 26, 2015, Doc. 108.
212 Email: Mulshine to Reid and Blackburn Re:
TECO – Minutes on Stock Awards for Ray and
Frank (9.17.2012)
SEC-BLACKBURNRP-
0004580-82
278 Email: Blackburn to Ray Amanollahi, Frank
Itak, Mulshine and others Re: 4th revision to
Treaty BELIZE OIL REBUTTAL.doc
(1.31.2012)
SEC-WRD-E-0000029
287 Email: Mulshine to Frank Itak, Ray Amanollahi
Re:: TECO – Rev-1 of News Release (1-01-30)
SEC-WRD-0000001
335 Email: Mulshine to Amanolahi, Itak Re: TECO
– oil 10.26.2011
TBD - Warroom
document
339 Email: Blackburn to Amanollahi, Itak, Reid,
York Re: Fwd: oil 10.26.2011
TBD - Warroom
Document
Why are they doing it?
To unload their shares on some victim!
Quote:
•The fraudsters start the next round of “pumping” the stock—sometimes even with made-up press releases or expert statements—and point to the rising price as evidence of its performance, which falsely inflates the price even more.
•The fraudsters keep it up until eventually “dumping” their shares for a huge profit and leaving investors scrambling to get rid of worthless stock as the price plummets. Fraudsters often claim the stock is under attack to encourage investors to hold positions by implying hedge fund control, naked short selling, or other conspiracy theories to mask the shares being dumped.
Same Ole Dizzy Donnie Spins!
Same Ole Ho Down Barney Bromance Dance!
Dizzy Donnie and Lyin Cryin Lois on the Left!
Next we'll hear:
800m fake NSS share!
57 failed court cases!
20,000 shareholder!
Financials being filed at the end of the month!
YADA YADA YADA!!
Same Ole Lyin Cryin Lois stories!
The Real Truth!
HTTPS://promotionstocksecrets.com/the-sec-just-suspended-my-stock-now-what/
What the company does only matters if it hopes to resume trading one day. Several recent cases suggest the SEC is now recommending that issuers who want to make things right should accept revocation, and then get two years of audited filings in order and file a new Form 10. That has the advantage of relieving the company from the obligation to catch up with dozens of old financial reports, which might prove an impossible task, but it has the disadvantage of leaving shareholders in the lurch for as long as it takes to get the filings in, find a sponsoring market maker, and get a Form 211 approved by FINRA.
Once registration has been revoked, the stock's ticker will be deleted. Shareholders will still be shareholders, but in a private company. Their stock will be extremely illiquid, and its value will be difficult to determine, as there is no public market for it.
Companies suspended for suspected fraud have usually been quite active in the recent past, and perhaps are currently active. The three most recent suspensions for cause brought by the agency were of Polar Petroleum Corp (POLR), Biozoom, Inc. (BIZM), and Norstra Energy (NORX), all of which had been trading vigorously just before the SEC brought down the hammer.
Yep and the corporation i.e. Treaty can also be held accountable for their Clownfish babblings.
http://info.legalzoom.com/can-company-held-liable-did-wrong-26117.html
Criminal Liability
Like individuals, companies can be held liable for certain crimes like theft and forgery. In order to be found criminally liable, it is not necessary that everyone in the company know about the wrongdoing. The company may be found guilty if at least one of its representatives knew of the wrongdoing and the crime was committed on behalf of the company.
Civil Liability
As with criminal liability, a company can be held civilly liable if one of its agents is acting in the scope of his employment and for the benefit of the corporation when the misdeed occurs. Like criminal liability, there is no requirement that every one of the company's representatives know of the wrongdoing in order for the business to be held liable. Corporate liability may arise if a single agent,(Clownfish), officer or representative is aware of the wrongful conduct.
Vicarious Liability
Under the doctrine of vicarious liability, corporate liability can arise despite the company and its officers having no knowledge of the wrongdoing. This form of liability is a kind of strict liability, which is referred to as "strict" because lack of knowledge is not a proper defense. This doctrine is based on the idea that because a corporation is not a person, it can only act through the conduct of its employees and agents. For example, an air conditioning company may be held liable for damages when one of its repairmen caused an accident because he was rushing to get to a job on time. It makes no difference that none of the company's officers knew of or encouraged the repairman's conduct. (or Clownfish lying on behalf)
Piercing the Corporate Veil
It is not only the corporation that can be held liable for wrongdoing. Although corporate officers are generally protected from liability for the corporation's losses, they may be held liable in certain cases. When corporate officers have disregarded certain formalities that are necessary for the operation of a company -- like failing to follow bookkeeping procedures and commingling personal and business funds -- the corporate form will be disregarded and the individuals will be held personally liable for the losses of the business. Although these officers must have knowledge of the wrongdoing to be held liable, it is not necessary for other employees to also know about it.
And yes folks Jerry's kids are referenced in the court documents also!
278 Email: Blackburn to Ray Amanollahi, Frank
Itak, Mulshine and others Re: 4th revision to
Treaty BELIZE OIL REBUTTAL.doc
(1.31.2012)
SEC-WRD-E-0000029
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 14: All communications between you and Platon Petratos, Frank Itak or Reza M. Amanollahi (a.k.a. Ray Amano).
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 37: All communications between you and Louie Kneitz, Frank or Donny Lelievre.
Case 2:15-cv-02451-CJB-SS Document 133-2 Filed 07/03/16
2 These quotes, published on InverstorHub by kanola to dloggold, were e-mails from Samantha Cox to her friends in the Immigration and Customs office and were inadvertently produced. They then became the subject of a sealed protective motion to return same, Doc.lOO, which was GRANTED by the Magistrate on October 26, 2015, Doc. 108.
212 Email: Mulshine to Reid and Blackburn Re:
TECO – Minutes on Stock Awards for Ray and
Frank (9.17.2012)
SEC-BLACKBURNRP-
0004580-82
278 Email: Blackburn to Ray Amanollahi, Frank
Itak, Mulshine and others Re: 4th revision to
Treaty BELIZE OIL REBUTTAL.doc
(1.31.2012)
SEC-WRD-E-0000029
287 Email: Mulshine to Frank Itak, Ray Amanollahi
Re:: TECO – Rev-1 of News Release (1-01-30)
SEC-WRD-0000001
335 Email: Mulshine to Amanolahi, Itak Re: TECO
– oil 10.26.2011
TBD - Warroom
document
339 Email: Blackburn to Amanollahi, Itak, Reid,
York Re: Fwd: oil 10.26.2011
TBD - Warroom
Document
Why are they doing it?
To unload their shares on some victim!
Quote:
•The fraudsters start the next round of “pumping” the stock—sometimes even with made-up press releases or expert statements—and point to the rising price as evidence of its performance, which falsely inflates the price even more.
•The fraudsters keep it up until eventually “dumping” their shares for a huge profit and leaving investors scrambling to get rid of worthless stock as the price plummets. Fraudsters often claim the stock is under attack to encourage investors to hold positions by implying hedge fund control, naked short selling, or other conspiracy theories to mask the shares being dumped.
Same Ole Dizzy Donnie Spins!
Same Ole Ho Down Barney Bromance Dance!
Dizzy Donnie and Lyin Cryin Lois on the Left!
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
