Agreed, thanks Kronberg for being proactive on this.
King, there was no need to begin with for Protalix to mention such a trivial matter. I've never known a trial to provide the reasons for the drop-out of patients if the patients dropped-out for non-investigational product related reasons. You'd have a long list of reasons that no-one really cares about.
However, indeed it was unfortunate to the extent that not having that information was for a specific individual CC Abbott enough of a reason through lack of understanding to promulgate that somehow these drop-outs might have been related to product (despite the provision of the safety data), and in doing-so recklessly assisting (and continuing to do so) in the spread of misleading information and quite likely also a contributing factor in the significant drop in share price. Her article was posted at 10:58am eastern time, and the largest drop yesterday can be seen between 11:02 and 11:08 eastern time.
I rarely use this term for anybody, but seriously what an idiot. And to post that as a SA article of all things. SA is seen a respected place for stock analysis. At best this articel reduces the credibility of SA as a source, and at worst it has real world impact on people's investments they've made with their hard earned cash. Remember PLX is only 12% Insitition owned.
And now we have our self-confessed PLX shorting investor Tomix "slither" his way back onto the board, trying to make money off lies, compounded by other peoples' unfounded loss on the stock. Despicable.
